Categories
Opinion

A bike ride to adulthood and why we need to ask for more

I still remember when I learned to ride a bike. I lived in an apartment building that surrounded an inner courtyard. It was in this courtyard that my dad pushed me down one of the sides and let go, and it was in that moment that he let me go that I knew how to ride a bike, and I flew and flew and flew around that square until the sun had set and I was exhausted. My dad told me he was scared the whole time; I wasn’t.

Beyond the courtyard I went, as my family moved to a bigger home in the neighborhood across the street. My sister and I explored that neighborhood on our bikes, exhausting every corner, every cul-de-sac, until we reigned the land, but we were unsatisfied, and moved on to our old domain, the old apartments. We discovered that there were three identical buildings, all with their own unique courtyards– and ours was the best (It had a playground and a paved square around it and grass). And when we were done with that, we moved to the streets surrounding our elementary school, but found those to be dreary, devoid of life. We roamed around the gas station at the end of our residential zone, the college campus down the other way, and even to the library. We were not afraid of cars; we were not afraid of anything.

I remember re-learning how to ride a bike in Cincinnati, one and a half years ago in December 2023. My friend Bryce had convinced me to go on a bike ride with him from OTR, where I live, up the Central Parkway bike lane and into Camp Washington to the Cincinnati Sign Museum. I was terrified the whole time: Cars constantly wooshed past us in our narrow little lane, with large plastic toothpicks and some paint the only barriers between us and death. Turning left was confusing and terrifying– How do we stay in the bike lane? Do we need to get out and dart into traffic to get into the left lane? What if an oncoming car doesn’t see us while we’re in the intersection during the unprotected turn? It was cold but I was sweating. I was afraid to brake too hard but also afraid to go fast. I thought to myself that I would never ride a bike again.

Somewhere between childhood and adulthood, our sense of curiosity and exploration is overtaken by fear, but I think that only happens if we have forgotten how to explore and assess risk. Those two things are so important to childhood development, but how do we carry these skills into adulthood? 

Now I ride my bike almost everywhere– I will cut even a five-minute walk down to a one-minute bike ride because I can. No bike lanes were built for me, but it took a kind and patient friend. It took the right environment and the right draws: A neighborhood with slow traffic, a single grocery store, a single library, a single coffee shop. And it took a willingness to be uncomfortable.

I don’t have all the solutions, but if we are dreaming of a car-free urban basin, why are we dreaming of spending millions on protected bike lanes when there will be nothing to protect them from? We shouldn’t just ask for a sliver of the road; we need to be asking for the whole damn thing. Not just for bikes, but for people to cross wherever they want, for people in wheelchairs to roll freely without being honked at or mowed down, for kids to run around and play and for picnics and barbecues and birthday parties to spill out. 

A woman wearing a bicycle helmet and black tank top riding a bicycle. The bike is just out of frame, with only the handlebars peaking from the bottom middle of the frame. She is on a bridge overlooking a river. A ferry sits on the left side of the frame. Behind her is another bridge. The sky takes up the top half of the frame; it is cloudy but the sky is bright and blue.
Me victoriously taking up space on the Purple People Bridge.


Next Thursday, July 10 6-8pm, Rick Holt from the Early Childhood Mobility Coalition will be coming to YARD & CO (1542 Pleasant St.) to have a conversation about the intersection of infrastructure, culture, and individual actions in the effort to equip our next generation with the tools they need to safely navigate the world. My opinions are mine only, and I’d love to hear what Rick has to say!

Categories
Business Development Opinion

Open letter: We Support the Proposed Hyde Park Square Development

If you aren’t aware, the group against building apartments, a hotel, and a parking garage in Hyde Park Square just successfully put the project on the November ballot. In response, the leadership of Civic Cincinnati sent the below letter to Cincinnati City Council after a unanimous 14-0 vote.

Civic Cincinnati is Cincinnati’s Strong Towns Local Conversation group. Strong Towns advocates for cities to be safe, livable and inviting, with a pattern of development that’s financially strong and resilient.

That doesn’t describe Hyde Park Square today. It shows a lack of vibrancy demonstrated by the paucity of people walking and congregating there. By removing buildings that have not kept up with modern building standards and renovating another building, the developer hopes to change this, bringing new residents and visitors to the Square and its businesses.

Every city neighborhood has concerns about traffic safety, especially for vulnerable children. Blaming development for furthering these problems denies the reality that additional density actually improves pedestrian safety.

More people walking through and around Hyde Park Square sends a signal to drivers to use caution when driving there. That, in turn, encourages more people to walk rather than drive. Hyde Park can continue to improve safe and comfortable walkability by making further traffic calming enhancements a priority for future budget requests.

While neighborhoods have an important voice in development plans, their concerns must be tempered by the need to build more housing city-wide. Giving neighborhoods veto power over development will not lead to the kind of strong, resilient neighborhoods the city needs, and which this council has bravely stood up for.

Every new project promises to change the familiar landscape neighborhood residents consider their home. Planning for opposition needs to be an important element of the process. The city can’t afford to allow that opposition to prevent the progress we must make to increase housing at all levels and price points. That’s what we’ve elected you to do – make the hard decisions that benefit the entire city.

Connected Communities is a first step in unleashing the power of zoning reform to increase housing in Cincinnati. No neighborhood can be exempt from change. We support efforts for the developer and their intermediary to work with Hyde Park’s residents, businesses, community council and organizations on a design that will make all of them proud of their community in 20 years.

We love Cincinnati. We want to stay here. Many of us are recent college graduates or in the early stages of our careers. We’re finding it tough to find rental housing in neighborhoods where we want to live, and buying a house seems like an impossible dream.

We need our city leaders to recognize that we’re the city’s future. Our needs are as important as those of longtime residents who oppose the development our city needs to house us now, and attract more of us to make our lives here.

Categories
Development Opinion

OPINION – To Grow or Not to Grow? Hyde Park Square vote crucial test for Cincinnati’s Future


This week, City Council is poised to vote on a proposed $150 million investment that would replace a one-story building and a sea of surface parking lots with a 150-unit apartment building, 75-room hotel, and 300-space parking garage on Hyde Park Square. Now, after
months of controversy and accusations of a “Manhattanization” of Hyde Park, a simple question lies before City Council that will decide this project’s fate: will Cincinnati grow or are we content with death by stagnation? Will we embrace growth, or will “housing for thee, just not next to me” prevail as a precedent in Cincinnati?

Counterpoints

There are several points of contention that the Save Hyde Park group and others have raised about the development including pedestrian safety, neighborhood character, and the affordability of housing. These talking points are at best misguided and at worst fallacies; here’s why:

Pedestrian Safety and Traffic

Pedestrian safety is an issue of paramount importance to the health of Cincinnati, so when someone raises this concern, I listen. However, when this issue is raised as a point in opposition to development, it fails to understand that additional density increases the walkability
of a neighborhood. When people are spread out, they are forced to drive to their destination. By increasing the residents and business living on the Square, the city is increasing pedestrian activity. To put it simply: opposing development is the antithesis to pedestrian safety. Moreover, 17.9% of Cincinnatians don’t own a car, and a 2017 study – individuals living in multi-family buildings drive 20.6% less than their Single-Family counterparts. So, when the city builds dense housing near key business districts, we are increasing opportunities for folks who do not own cars.

Neighborhood Character

The proposed project will be 85 feet after setbacks and 65 feet tall at Hyde Park Square– consistent with several of the buildings in the square. A quick scan of the neighborhood would prove that it’s not “just too big”. The A L’aise building also sits at 65 feet at Hyde Park Square. Michigan Terrace stands at 79 feet tall on the northern part of the square after setbacks. Moreover, other condominium towers in the neighborhood at Madison House and the Regency sit at 15 and 20 stories in height respectively– towering over this proposal. The vibrancy of Hyde Park Square is essential to the character of the Hyde Park community, and the viability of the square is dependent on having enough foot traffic to support the businesses. Unfortunately, Hyde Park has only added 53 net housing units between 2023-25. The decades’ lack of investment in net new housing throughout the neighborhood and around the Square caused both population loss and lessened the capacity for the Square to serve the neighborhood. Since 1970, Hyde Park has lost 3,000 residents, and since 2002, Hyde Park Square has seen a 16% drop in employment. A neighborhood with a declining population, facing competition for customers from other emerging areas in the region, and inflated costs of running businesses and restaurants can and will create a situation where the beating heart of a neighborhood will beat less and less. This development is essential to the preserving and enhancing character of the neighborhood.

Affordable Housing Shortage


We cannot afford stagnation when we are amidst a housing shortage that, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, is the top driver of inflation. Neighborhoods and cities need to be constantly evolving to meet the demands of today, and there is a bias in community councils to preserve as-is. Adding 150 units of housing in the beating heart of a high demand neighborhood helps to ease these inflationary pressures, especially in a place like Hyde Park, which has seen little multi-family development in the past 40 years. At first glance, a boutique hotel may not help with housing affordability, however, providing out of town visitors hotel rooms frees up housing units that would otherwise be rented as Airbnb’s and short-term rentals. Moreover, by making this a truly mixed-use project with the addition of the hotel makes a project that is bringing desperately needed housing to the city financially viable.

The Stakes of a Future Cincinnati

This is a critical vote in the history of our city. If Council does not approve this project, the consequences will be drastic. Neighborhoods should be allowed to garner input on their future, but their concerns ought to be tempered by the dire need for housing at a city-wide level. Hyde Park Square is an important neighborhood business district in the city. Letting a surface parking lot and one-story building sit for years has and will continue to negatively affect the viability of the Square. Neighborhood level veto power of development leads to a compounding housing shortage that is insurmountable. Cincinnati cannot just have a strong downtown–we need strong, resilient neighborhoods. Without both, the city we love will become unrecognizable and unlivable. Decisions need to be made by elected leaders, experts in planning and development, and yes with community input. Only considering community input in development
is the wrong lens to view the city–even a city of neighborhoods. A no vote will cause a fully unbalanced decision-making tree. Elevating community input from community councils, who are often unrepresentative of the neighborhood as a whole, above the needs of the city as whole would impair the ability of the City of Cincinnati to solve its housing crisis, grow, and function as a municipality. That is the dire precedent a no vote would set: a precedent that puts the desires of the few above the needs of the many; a Cincinnati with no clear direction functioning with countless microstates; an untenable solution for our future. For the greater good of our city, Council must vote yes on the planned development this week. Juncta Juvant.

Categories
Opinion Transportation

Don’t we all need sidewalks?

Cincinnati’s Department of Public Services (DPS) recently released their Snow Removal Plan for this year, and I am disappointed yet unsurprised to see the measly half-page describing the City’s snow removal plan for sidewalks: In short, there is no plan.

The City’s sidewalk snow removal plan, a half-page describing property owner liability.

City officials tout the fact that nearly 30% of Cincinnati households do not have a car to back their dream of building a truly connected city, but when it comes to reality, we continue to prioritize cars, not people. 

The reality is that removing snow from sidewalks does not benefit just 30% of people, it benefits 100% of us. We all use the sidewalk. If you have kids, you probably drop them off at a curbside and watch them walk down a sidewalk to their school building. If you go for an outing downtown, you will certainly need the sidewalk to get to your shop, restaurant, or bar. If you use a wheelchair, you need the sidewalk for your daily life. Sidewalks aren’t (only) a means to equity, they are a means for people.

The way we choose to operate a city is a matter of values. Do we truly value connected communities by providing a means of face-to-face interactions in a neighborhood? Do we value public health by prioritizing the people who choose to walk as a component of an active lifestyle? The blocked up sidewalk from the snow plow tells me no.

Categories
Development

Deliberating the D Word (Density)

Julie Carpenter of Soapbox Cincinnati has a great article outlining all the ways increased density helps cities build and maintain themselves sustainably.

You can read this as a both a complement to the city’s proposed Connected Communities plan — and a way to help address some of the issues identified by the Futures Commission.

Deliberating the D Word (Density)

A student project that reimagines the Findlay Market district as a cultural hub (Students: Caroline VanBuskirk and Lanie Tarowsky. Advisor: Hyesung Jeong