Cincinnati’s Recommended Budget Calls for 201 Layoffs, Program Eliminations

Cincinnati City Manager Milton Dohoney released his recommended budget that makes a large number of cuts to fill the $35 million budget gap left behind following the State of Ohio’s reduction of $26 million in funding to the City of Cincinnati.

The original budget proposal from Dohoney included $25.8 million from an upfront payment included in the parking lease and modernization plan, which would have also included $3 million in annual payments thereafter. This proposal was approved 5-4 by City Council, but was put on hold by a local court until opponents were able to file petitions and get the proposal put on this November’s ballot for public vote.

“Though a legal victory is being vigorously pursued, the ultimate resolution is not assured in time to affect what must be in place by June 1 to take effect July 1, 2013,” Dohoney explained. “Should a final legal victory be realized after July 1, the Administration would presume to move expeditiously to reverse some of the impacts of the cuts contained within the recommended budget.”

Cincinnati Mounted Patrol
Cincinnati’s mounted patrol would be cut entirely if City Council passes the recommended budget. Photograph by Randy Simes for UrbanCincy.

The end result of these cuts includes the elimination of 66 police officers, 71 fire fighters, 64 city employees, and the elimination of 60 vacant positions. The recommended budget will also eliminate funding for the following items:

  • Greater Cincinnati Energy Alliance ($150,000)
  • Urban Agricultural Program ($65,000)
  • Heritage Events Subsidy – Opening Day Parade, St. Patrick’s Day Parade, Black Family Reunion, Juneteenth ($36,000)
  • Camp Washington, Fairview, Filson, Spring Grove Village, and Ziegler Pools ($167,650)
  • Bush Recreation Center in Walnut Hills ($127,710)
  • Energy Management Program ($100,010)
  • Mounted Patrol ($95,000)
  • Community Prosecution Program ($83,857)
  • Delinquent Accounts/Receivables Program ($75,460)
  • Claims Program ($55,680)
  • Tire Collection Program ($30,880)

In addition to the elimination of these programs, no funding is budgeted for either 2014 or 2015 as a result of limited General Fund resources.

Furloughs for City Management staff will also take place, and the City of Cincinnati would also use a larger amount of projected casino revenues to balance this budget, even though Dohoney has recommended against that in the past due to the unpredictability of these funds.

“While balancing a budget deficit with mostly cuts is not preferred, the timing of the new fiscal year coupled with the timing of the litigation over the parking deal makes it the only real option with a number this large,” Dohoney stated in a prepared release. “Our goal is going to be to recall staff as soon as possible and provide the best customer service we can deliver for the citizens in the meantime.”

A number of other measures are taken in the recommended budget to help close the budget gap, but the large amount of savings is realized through personnel layoffs. Dohoney has also recommended that the property tax millage increase from 5.7 mills to its maximum allowed 6.1 mills to raise an additional $1.3 million annually.

To help engage the public in this budget process, Cincinnati Vice Mayor Roxanne Qualls (C) has scheduled three public hearings. The first will take place at the Duke Energy Convention Center on Thursday, May 16 at 6:30pm, the second will occur on Monday, May 20 at 6:30pm at the College Hill Recreation Center, and the final meeting will take place at the Madisonville Recreation Center on Wednesday, May 22 at 6:30pm.

“My priority for the FY 2014 city operating budget is to make sure that all Cincinnati’s neighborhoods are safe and that we continue to attack blight that breeds crime,” Qualls stated. “As chair of the Budget and Finance Committee I will work to further reduce the number of layoffs for police, fire and health department personnel, to ensure that we keep all our neighborhoods safe and clean.”

  • http://5chw4r7z.com 5chw4r7z

    Thanks Cranley for helping kill the plan to save fire/police jobs, and Kasich for causing the issue to begin with.

    And the budget cuts forcommunity rograms is only the tip of the iceburg as it doesn’t reflect matching grants from state and federal sources. The city cuts will be amplified three fold in some cases.

  • Don_Thompson

    Is the proposed budget available for viewing online? If so, what is the link?

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/Nate-Wessel/100002013606145 Nate Wessel

    Just spent the afternoon looking around for local government jobs. Looks like I can permanently take Cincinnati-oh.gov out of my bookmarks! :-(

    I’m not sure why we ever had a mounted patrol to begin with. Horses are crazy expensive and not all that practical in the 21st century, especially in the city. Can anyone say ‘bicycles’?

    • http://www.UrbanCincy.com/ Randy A. Simes

      I was actually just discussing with a friend yesterday about how I think bicycle patrols are superior than car patrols for neighborhood policing. They put the cops right there on the streets in a much more intimate fashion, but they’re still very mobile.

      I think the mounted patrols are more so for community relations, particularly in high tourist/family zones. Otherwise bicycle patrols are far more economical and effective. I wonder if there is a comprehensive list out there of which cities still have mounted patrols.

    • http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=28702311 Kyle Wynk

      http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/news/nation/2010-02-11-mounted-police_N.htm A bit dated, but interesting in regards to Mounted Police.

    • charles ross

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_mounted_police_forces

      I think that the Segway is also a little like a horse as far as elevation and access to tight spots.

    • Mark Christol

      I really doubt the police see bikes & horses as interchangeable. The big advantage to horses is in dealing with crowds because they give the officer height which gives him a good viewpoint & makes him visible to the crowd – all the while being mobile. With the elimination of the horses & the ridiculous decision to get rid of officers’ hats, it’s going to be really hard to find a cop in a crowd. I imagine the viewpoint advantage could be replaced with drone technology but I would assume the usual gang of idiots who killed the horses would oppose it as well & mount a FUD campaign and referendum to block it.

    • zschmiez

      Couldnt we have some sort of automated cop, like a robot-cop??? JK

      I always viewed the mounted patrol as a goal of some officers; go from beat cop to regular patrol to mounted patrol. They usually work large events and patrol the downtown, so it beats driving around the burbs catching skateboarders.

      If this gets cut, someone will step up and cover the cost on this one (for better or worse).